Last updated: 7 November 2026. Facts are vendor claims checked on that date; nothing was tested independently.

Mindgard

A research-rooted vendor offering both continuous automated testing and expert engagements. It names the widest set of frameworks of the independents, including EU AI Act Article 55.

Visit Mindgard (opens in a new tab) Back to comparison

What it tests

Claimed on the vendor's own pages. Nothing here was tested independently.

• Jailbreaks
• Prompt injection
• Agent / tool abuse
• Data leakage
• Model supply chain
• Multimodal
• MCP
• Model poisoning
• Model extraction

Framework mappings

OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 42001. Names EU AI Act Article 55 specifically.

Offering

• An automated red-teaming platform.
• Managed red-teaming and pentesting engagements, typically 4-6 weeks per application.

Pricing

Not public. Not public. Free tier: none stated. See what AI red teaming costs.

Ownership history

Independent. A Lancaster University spinout founded in 2022.

Alternatives

Three vendors with a similar offering type and overlapping coverage. Chosen by category and claimed coverage, then alphabetically; no ranking is implied.

• Adversa AI

  Both (platform + service) Independent (VC-backed)

  A research-heavy specialist offering continuous red teaming, with an audit that it says covers the full OWASP LLM Top 10.

• Lakera

  Both (platform + service) Acquired by Check Point

  A GenAI application security specialist, with Guard for runtime and Red for testing, now part of a large network security vendor. It offers both automated and expert-led red teaming.

• HiddenLayer

  Automated platform Independent

  A broad AI security platform. Red teaming runs as continuous, automated attack simulation alongside model supply-chain scanning and runtime defense.