Independent comparison. Some vendor buttons may use referral links; vendors never pay for placement or ordering. Read the disclosure.

Last updated: . Facts are vendor claims checked on that date; nothing was tested independently.

Best AI Red Teaming Companies (2026)

This is a comparison of 23 companies that sell AI red teaming: testing LLM apps, models and agents for jailbreaks, prompt injection, data leakage and unsafe behaviour. Vendors are listed alphabetically within three groups (both, automated platform, managed service). Nothing is ranked or scored. Every fact is a vendor claim or a dated press statement, linked to its source, and checked on 2026-11-07.

Of the 23 vendors, 14 sell an automated platform, 5 sell a managed or crowdsourced service, and 4 sell both. 7 have been acquired since 2024. Only 2 publish a dollar price.

How to choose

Comparison table

Three tables, one per offering type, alphabetical inside each. Scroll sideways on a phone. Abbreviations in "What it tests": JB = Jailbreaks · PI = Prompt injection · AG = Agent / tool abuse · DL = Data leakage · BS = Bias, safety, harmful content · SC = Model supply chain · MM = Multimodal. A mapping is shown only if the vendor claims it on its own pages.

Both (platform + service)

A platform you can run yourself plus expert-led or crowdsourced engagements.

Vendor Ownership What it tests (claimed) Framework mappings (claimed) Pricing public? Free tier HQ
Adversa AI Independent (VC-backed) PI , JB , DL , AG ; Agents and MCP; Adversarial examples; Misinformation; Coding-agent security platform OWASP LLM Top 10 No No Not stated
Gray Swan Independent AG ; Tool, MCP, API and file access None named No No Pittsburgh, PA, US (per press coverage)
Lakera Acquired by Check Point JB , PI , AG , DL , BS , MM ; Multilingual attacks None named No Unclear Site lists a San Francisco address (Lakera Inc)
Mindgard Independent JB , PI , AG , DL , SC , MM ; MCP; Model poisoning; Model extraction OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 42001 No No Boston, MA, US, with a London office

Automated platform

Automated attack libraries you run against your own models, apps or agents, often in CI/CD.

Vendor Ownership What it tests (claimed) Framework mappings (claimed) Pricing public? Free tier HQ
Cisco AI Defense Robust Intelligence acquired by Cisco PI , AG , DL , BS , MM , SC ; 200+ attack techniques and subcategories (data sheet); Multimodal attacks in 10 languages; Supply chain is a separate component OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP Agentic Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act No No Not stated
Enkrypt AI Acquired by Anaconda PI , JB , DL , BS , MM ; MCP scanning; Multimodal on higher plans NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act Yes Yes Brighton, MA, US
F5 AI Red Team CalypsoAI acquired by F5 PI , JB , DL ; Multi-turn jailbreaks; RAG data leakage OWASP LLM Top 10 No No Not stated (CalypsoAI was based in Dublin)
Giskard Independent PI , DL , BS , AG ; Hallucination; RAG quality OWASP LLM Top 10 No Yes France
HiddenLayer Independent JB , PI , AG , DL , SC ; Model poisoning; Model extraction None named No No Austin, TX, US
Holistic AI Independent PI , JB , BS , AG , DL ; Bias, toxicity and hallucination; Runtime data leakage NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NYC Local Law 144 No No Not confirmed on an opened page (search results say London)
Lasso Security Independent PI , JB , AG ; 3,000+ attack library; Tool-chain manipulation; Context poisoning OWASP LLM Top 10, NIST AI RMF, MITRE (ATLAS not named) No Unclear Not stated
Noma Security Independent (VC-backed) PI , JB , DL , BS , AG ; Cross-tenant data leakage; Agent supply-chain misconfiguration OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 42001 No No Not stated
Pillar Security Independent AG ; Tool orchestration; Permission escalation; Multi-turn attacks OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act No No Not stated
Prisma AIRS (Palo Alto) Protect AI acquired by Palo Alto Networks JB , AG , BS , SC ; 500+ attack vectors across 50+ techniques (docs); Model scanning in Prisma AIRS OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF No No Not stated
Promptfoo Part of OpenAI PI , JB , DL , AG , BS ; Direct and indirect prompt injection; PII; Tool misuse, BOLA, SSRF; 50+ vulnerability types OWASP LLM Top 10, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act Yes Yes San Francisco, CA, US
Repello AI Independent PI , JB , DL , AG , MM ; Agents, MCP and RAG; Text, image and audio OWASP LLM Top 10, NIST AI RMF, MITRE (ATLAS not named) No Unclear Not stated (a Dover, DE address is shown, which looks like a registered agent)
SPLX Acquired by Zscaler PI , JB , AG ; Agents, MCP and RAG; Guardrail testing; 5,000+ attack simulations None named No Yes Not stated
Straiker Not stated (appears independent) PI , AG , DL ; MCP and inter-agent attacks; Goal hijacking OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act No Unclear Not stated

Managed service

Scoped assessments by consultancies or crowdsourced testers, delivered as a report.

Vendor Ownership What it tests (claimed) Framework mappings (claimed) Pricing public? Free tier HQ
Bishop Fox Not stated PI , JB , AG , DL , SC ; Prompt injection including RAG; Model extraction; Poisoning OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP ML Top 10, OWASP Agentic Top 10, MITRE ATLAS No No Tempe, AZ, US
Bugcrowd Not stated PI , DL , AG , BS ; Excessive agency; Poisoning; Bias assessment (separate engagement) OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, EU AI Act No No San Francisco, CA, US
HackerOne Not stated JB , PI , AG , DL , BS OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP Agentic Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act No No Not stated
NCC Group Not stated BS ; OWASP AI/ML and LLM risks; Threat modelling; Secure development lifecycle testing OWASP LLM Top 10, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 42001 No No Not stated
Trail of Bits Not stated PI , DL , AG , SC ; Training data and model IP leakage; Provenance, serialization and hardware None named No No New York mailing address only

All 23 vendors

Alphabetical. Each card links to a page with the full fact block, ownership history, sources and alternatives.

Who is not on this list, and why

Full selection rules and sources: methodology.