Adversa AI
A research-heavy specialist offering continuous red teaming, with an audit that it says covers the full OWASP LLM Top 10.
Independent comparison. Some vendor buttons may use referral links; vendors never pay for placement or ordering. Read the disclosure.
This is a comparison of 23 companies that sell AI red teaming: testing LLM apps, models and agents for jailbreaks, prompt injection, data leakage and unsafe behaviour. Vendors are listed alphabetically within three groups (both, automated platform, managed service). Nothing is ranked or scored. Every fact is a vendor claim or a dated press statement, linked to its source, and checked on 2026-11-07.
Of the 23 vendors, 14 sell an automated platform, 5 sell a managed or crowdsourced service, and 4 sell both. 7 have been acquired since 2024. Only 2 publish a dollar price.
Three tables, one per offering type, alphabetical inside each. Scroll sideways on a phone. Abbreviations in "What it tests": JB = Jailbreaks · PI = Prompt injection · AG = Agent / tool abuse · DL = Data leakage · BS = Bias, safety, harmful content · SC = Model supply chain · MM = Multimodal. A mapping is shown only if the vendor claims it on its own pages.
A platform you can run yourself plus expert-led or crowdsourced engagements.
| Vendor | Ownership | What it tests (claimed) | Framework mappings (claimed) | Pricing public? | Free tier | HQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adversa AI | Independent (VC-backed) | PI , JB , DL , AG ; Agents and MCP; Adversarial examples; Misinformation; Coding-agent security platform | OWASP LLM Top 10 | No | No | Not stated |
| Gray Swan | Independent | AG ; Tool, MCP, API and file access | None named | No | No | Pittsburgh, PA, US (per press coverage) |
| Lakera | Acquired by Check Point | JB , PI , AG , DL , BS , MM ; Multilingual attacks | None named | No | Unclear | Site lists a San Francisco address (Lakera Inc) |
| Mindgard | Independent | JB , PI , AG , DL , SC , MM ; MCP; Model poisoning; Model extraction | OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 42001 | No | No | Boston, MA, US, with a London office |
Automated attack libraries you run against your own models, apps or agents, often in CI/CD.
| Vendor | Ownership | What it tests (claimed) | Framework mappings (claimed) | Pricing public? | Free tier | HQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco AI Defense | Robust Intelligence acquired by Cisco | PI , AG , DL , BS , MM , SC ; 200+ attack techniques and subcategories (data sheet); Multimodal attacks in 10 languages; Supply chain is a separate component | OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP Agentic Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act | No | No | Not stated |
| Enkrypt AI | Acquired by Anaconda | PI , JB , DL , BS , MM ; MCP scanning; Multimodal on higher plans | NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act | Yes | Yes | Brighton, MA, US |
| F5 AI Red Team | CalypsoAI acquired by F5 | PI , JB , DL ; Multi-turn jailbreaks; RAG data leakage | OWASP LLM Top 10 | No | No | Not stated (CalypsoAI was based in Dublin) |
| Giskard | Independent | PI , DL , BS , AG ; Hallucination; RAG quality | OWASP LLM Top 10 | No | Yes | France |
| HiddenLayer | Independent | JB , PI , AG , DL , SC ; Model poisoning; Model extraction | None named | No | No | Austin, TX, US |
| Holistic AI | Independent | PI , JB , BS , AG , DL ; Bias, toxicity and hallucination; Runtime data leakage | NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NYC Local Law 144 | No | No | Not confirmed on an opened page (search results say London) |
| Lasso Security | Independent | PI , JB , AG ; 3,000+ attack library; Tool-chain manipulation; Context poisoning | OWASP LLM Top 10, NIST AI RMF, MITRE (ATLAS not named) | No | Unclear | Not stated |
| Noma Security | Independent (VC-backed) | PI , JB , DL , BS , AG ; Cross-tenant data leakage; Agent supply-chain misconfiguration | OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 42001 | No | No | Not stated |
| Pillar Security | Independent | AG ; Tool orchestration; Permission escalation; Multi-turn attacks | OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act | No | No | Not stated |
| Prisma AIRS (Palo Alto) | Protect AI acquired by Palo Alto Networks | JB , AG , BS , SC ; 500+ attack vectors across 50+ techniques (docs); Model scanning in Prisma AIRS | OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF | No | No | Not stated |
| Promptfoo | Part of OpenAI | PI , JB , DL , AG , BS ; Direct and indirect prompt injection; PII; Tool misuse, BOLA, SSRF; 50+ vulnerability types | OWASP LLM Top 10, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act | Yes | Yes | San Francisco, CA, US |
| Repello AI | Independent | PI , JB , DL , AG , MM ; Agents, MCP and RAG; Text, image and audio | OWASP LLM Top 10, NIST AI RMF, MITRE (ATLAS not named) | No | Unclear | Not stated (a Dover, DE address is shown, which looks like a registered agent) |
| SPLX | Acquired by Zscaler | PI , JB , AG ; Agents, MCP and RAG; Guardrail testing; 5,000+ attack simulations | None named | No | Yes | Not stated |
| Straiker | Not stated (appears independent) | PI , AG , DL ; MCP and inter-agent attacks; Goal hijacking | OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act | No | Unclear | Not stated |
Scoped assessments by consultancies or crowdsourced testers, delivered as a report.
| Vendor | Ownership | What it tests (claimed) | Framework mappings (claimed) | Pricing public? | Free tier | HQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop Fox | Not stated | PI , JB , AG , DL , SC ; Prompt injection including RAG; Model extraction; Poisoning | OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP ML Top 10, OWASP Agentic Top 10, MITRE ATLAS | No | No | Tempe, AZ, US |
| Bugcrowd | Not stated | PI , DL , AG , BS ; Excessive agency; Poisoning; Bias assessment (separate engagement) | OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, EU AI Act | No | No | San Francisco, CA, US |
| HackerOne | Not stated | JB , PI , AG , DL , BS | OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP Agentic Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act | No | No | Not stated |
| NCC Group | Not stated | BS ; OWASP AI/ML and LLM risks; Threat modelling; Secure development lifecycle testing | OWASP LLM Top 10, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 42001 | No | No | Not stated |
| Trail of Bits | Not stated | PI , DL , AG , SC ; Training data and model IP leakage; Provenance, serialization and hardware | None named | No | No | New York mailing address only |
Alphabetical. Each card links to a page with the full fact block, ownership history, sources and alternatives.
A research-heavy specialist offering continuous red teaming, with an audit that it says covers the full OWASP LLM Top 10.
An offensive-security consultancy with explicit OWASP (LLM, ML, Agentic) and MITRE ATLAS coverage.
Crowdsourced AI testing that sits alongside its bug bounty and vulnerability disclosure programs.
Red teaming as a validation feature of a broad enterprise AI security suite.
Self-serve, credit-priced red teaming and guardrails with a free tier.
Automated red teaming with "agent swarms", sold alongside F5 AI Guardrails.
Combines LLM quality testing (hallucination, RAG) with automated adversarial probing. It suits teams that want an open-source starting point.
Combines automation with a large crowd of human red teamers, and works on frontier-model pre-release testing.
Human-led, crowdsourced adversarial testing on a fixed timeline.
A broad AI security platform. Red teaming runs as continuous, automated attack simulation alongside model supply-chain scanning and runtime defense.
Suited to buyers whose need is driven by compliance rather than by the security team.
A GenAI application security specialist, with Guard for runtime and Red for testing, now part of a large network security vendor. It offers both automated and expert-led red teaming.
For buyers who want one platform for both testing and runtime protection of AI agents.
A research-rooted vendor offering both continuous automated testing and expert engagements. It names the widest set of frameworks of the independents, including EU AI Act Article 55.
A global consultancy whose AI/ML services include red teaming alongside threat modelling and secure development lifecycle work.
Red teaming is one module of an AI security platform with runtime detection and response.
Agent-focused; red-team findings feed straight into its runtime guardrails.
For buyers already on Palo Alto Networks. An attack agent profiles the target application and tailors its attacks, inside a broader AI security platform.
The most widely used open-source LLM red-teaming tool. The paid tiers add dashboards, SSO and continuous monitoring. Buyers should note that it is now owned by a model vendor.
A red-teaming-first platform with explicit multimodal (text, image, audio) and MCP/RAG coverage.
An attack-library-driven automated red-teaming platform aimed at agentic and MCP systems, with a free open-source scanner (Agentic Radar) as an entry point.
Agent-first automated red teaming.
Suited to buyers who need supply-chain and infrastructure depth as well as prompt-level testing.
Full selection rules and sources: methodology.